After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these kinds of systems. Right from lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the boundary to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being applied to asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to run these devices and to pursue their right for cover.
It also displays how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from accessing the channels of coverage. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in to the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/ mechanisms of these technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double impact: even though they assist with expedite the asylum process, they also generate it difficult to get refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.